More Civil War chat

I was reading an article on an entertainment website about Unfrosted, the Jerry Seinfeld Pop-Tart movie, and I made the mistake of clicking on another article about Civil War, and how Alex Garland really made a fatal slash unforgivable mistake of not picking a side. And I can't believe people are still up in arms about this, writing new articles about this, for multiple reasons.

a. has this critic not already decided who should have been labeled as good and who was bad (the answer is, they have), and if so, why do they need straight up exposition on this?

And b. what is this gross self-righteousness to say the film is diminished or even ruined (?!) because they weren't told who is good and who is bad, because clearly the bad guys are the bad guys and you are gutless if you can't say who the bad guys are,

And c. if you're so blinded to the message, the beauty or the achievement of the movie because of the lack of political labeling, then you should not be a movie critic,

And d. e. f. and fucking z. already. Z. being shut up.

If your view is this could have been a great movie, if only Alex Garland put red or blue patches on the soldiers, but since he did not it's garbage, you need to shut up.

As I said, my mistake for clicking on the article. Please, people, don't click on any more articles about Civil War. But do see the movie, because it's amazing.